Private Property Rights -vs- The EPA

( – In 2005, Michael and Chantell Sackett were working toward what many American families work toward, their own home on their own land, until the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) halted their plans by declaring it a “wetland.” [for this entire article visit Challenge to EPA over Individual Property Rights].

On Monday, Jan. 9, the Sacketts and their attorneys will ask the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court to not only restore the right to use their own land – but to break the absolute power the EPA has over protected wetlands.

The Sacketts, small business owners in Idaho, located a lot in the northern part of the state in a town called Priest Lake. According to court documents, the lot is less than an acre and is just 500 feet from Priest Lake on its west side. It is separated from the lake by a house and a road and has no standing water or any hydrologic connection to Lake Priest or any other body of water.

There are houses to the north and south of the lot.

The lot is located in an established residential area – a platted subdivision – with the required water and sewer hookups.

In 2005, after performing the necessary due diligence, the Sacketts purchased the lot for $23,000. They sought and obtained the needed permits to begin building their new home.

According to the Sacketts, shortly after they began laying gravel for construction, the EPA came onto the property and issued a compliance order without any notice, telling them that the land had been declared a “wetland,” and ordered them to restore the land to EPA’s liking or face $37,500 per day in fines.

About FineHomesDigest

The Fine Homes Team, Mark Finchem, Associate Broker with Long Realty Company, provides service to buyers, seller and builders where fine homes are concerned. With extensive experience in residential real estate transactions we can help you with the home you'd rather have.
This entry was posted in Fine Homes, Property Rights and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Private Property Rights -vs- The EPA

  1. Pingback: EPA Tries To Sack Sackette’s Constitutional Property Rights | Sandia Tea Party

  2. Pingback: EPA Tries To Sack Sackett Family’s Property Rights | Gadaboutblogalot's Blog

  3. Pingback: EPA drops jackboot on necks of couple for daring to build on their own land « truthsupport

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s